Conceptual Reconsideration of Emotion Regulation in the Digital Age: A Narrative Review
Keywords:
Emotion regulation, digital age, digital psychology, digital emotional literacy, narrative reviewAbstract
This study aims to conceptually reconsider emotion regulation in the context of contemporary digital and technological transformations through an integrative narrative review of the theoretical literature. This research adopted a qualitative narrative review design focused on theoretical analysis of scholarly literature. Data were collected through a systematic review of studies related to emotion regulation, digital psychology, new media, and human–technology interaction. A total of 12 peer-reviewed articles with strong conceptual relevance were purposefully selected. Data analysis was conducted using qualitative interpretive analysis, and coding and categorization processes were carried out with NVivo software (version 14). The review process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The findings indicate that emotion regulation in the digital age has shifted from a predominantly intrapersonal process to a contextual, interactive, and partially technology-mediated phenomenon. Accelerated emotional cycles, fragmented attention, algorithm-driven emotional shaping, and increased reliance on digital feedback emerged as key conceptual changes. In addition, the results highlighted both emerging emotional vulnerabilities and new opportunities for reconstructing adaptive emotion regulation strategies in digital environments. The study underscores the need to revise classical emotion regulation models and develop conceptual frameworks aligned with digital realities. Emotion regulation in the digital age should be understood as a co-regulatory process between individuals and technology, requiring integrated attention to psychological, technological, and ethical dimensions.
Downloads
References
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
Calvo, R. A., & Peters, D. (2014). Positive computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential. MIT Press.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
Kazdin, A. E., & Blase, S. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393527
Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.