Self-Regulated Learning Across Diverse Educational Contexts: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Keywords:
Self-regulated learning, qualitative systematic review, learning strategies, academic motivation, educational contextsAbstract
This study aimed to synthesize and explain the components, contextual factors, and outcomes of self-regulated learning across diverse educational settings through a qualitative systematic review. A qualitative systematic review approach was employed, and data were collected exclusively through a structured review of the relevant literature on self-regulated learning. Following systematic searching and the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, seventeen eligible studies were selected for final analysis. Data were analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis with NVivo software (version 14). Coding was conducted through open, axial, and selective stages, and the analysis continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. The findings indicated that self-regulated learning is a multidimensional and context-dependent process emerging from the interaction of cognitive and metacognitive components, motivational and emotional dimensions, and educational contextual factors. Core themes included the central role of learning strategies and metacognitive monitoring, the importance of self-efficacy and emotion regulation, and the influence of teachers, instructional design, and educational technologies. Moreover, outcomes such as enhanced academic achievement, deeper learning, active engagement, and readiness for lifelong learning were consistently reported. The results suggest that fostering self-regulated learning requires a comprehensive and context-sensitive approach that goes beyond teaching isolated strategies and can substantially enhance learning quality and educational success.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.596354
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.