Psychological Mechanisms of Identity Reconstruction After Academic Failure

Pegah Rafienezhad

Authors

Pegah Rafienezhad Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Corresponding author

Keywords:

academic failure, identity reconstruction, emotional processing, meaning-making, academic resilience

Abstract

This study aimed to synthesize and explain the psychological mechanisms involved in identity reconstruction following academic failure through a qualitative review of the literature. A qualitative review design using thematic analysis was employed. Data were collected exclusively through a systematic review of scholarly literature, with 19 peer-reviewed articles meeting predefined inclusion criteria selected as units of analysis. Article selection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Extracted textual data were organized and analyzed using NVivo software (version 14) through open coding, conceptual categorization, and theme development to identify recurring patterns and relationships relevant to identity reconstruction after academic failure. The findings indicated that identity reconstruction is a multidimensional and dynamic process comprising four core mechanisms: adaptive emotional processing of failure, cognitive redefinition of self and meaning-making, utilization of interpersonal and social support resources, and agentic strategies such as self-reflection, goal adjustment, and self-regulation. The interaction of these mechanisms facilitates a shift from a fragile, performance-dependent identity toward a flexible, growth-oriented, and coherent sense of self. The results suggest that academic failure is not inherently detrimental; when supported by effective emotional, cognitive, and social processes, it can serve as a catalyst for identity growth and psychological development, underscoring the need for supportive educational and counseling interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 59–77.

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 219–236.

McAdams, D. P. (2013). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.

Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). New York, NY: Routledge.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Weiner, B. (2014). The attribution approach to emotion and motivation. New York, NY: Springer.

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.